Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1472

reference
910-tree-1
name
1472
tree-preservation-order

undefined

910-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046348 50.866906)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046263 50.866897,-1.046267 50.866914,-1.046279 50.866929,-1.046297 50.866941,-1.046321 50.866949,-1.046347 50.866952,-1.046373 50.866949,-1.046397 50.866942,-1.046417 50.866930,-1.046429 50.866915,-1.046433 50.866899,-1.046430 50.866882,-1.046418 50.866867,-1.046399 50.866855,-1.046376 50.866847,-1.046349 50.866844,-1.046323 50.866846,-1.046299 50.866854,-1.046280 50.866866,-1.046267 50.866881,-1.046263 50.866897)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL